Researchers say that more than half of all email zinging
around the planet is junk mail - or spam. If your email
inbox is anything like mine you already knew that. It's
gotten so bad that MIT's Technology Review, a very
conservative technical journal, has no problem with
labeling the junk email phenomenon, and efforts to
eradicate it, the "Spam Wars."
In the publication's August 2003 edition the scientists
at MIT try to explain what can be done about spam.
They catalogue seven competing methods that are
available right now - all of which are designed to
identify and remove spam from your inbox and your life.
Here's a quick review:
· Signature Based Filtering - Anti-spam
software that creates and monitors fake email
accounts. Mail sent to the fake accounts must be
spam.
· Collaborative Filtering - Users vote on which
messages they think are spam.
· Gateway Filtering - A cooperative network
intercepts spam before it reaches user accounts.
· Heuristic Filtering - Rules-based content
filtering in which a filter scans email for junk mail tip-off
terms (IE: Viagra).
· Bayesian Filtering - A probability-based
system that learns the individual user's definition of
spam, one email at a time.
· Circle of Trust Filtering - Only pre-authorized
users can get their email through.
· Vaccinating Filtering - Hides users' email
addresses from spammers.
While there are definite plusses and minuses to each
system I have chosen the "collaborative" method. I use
SpamNet, a product from a company called Cloudmark.
Three-fourths of the email I get is spam, but SpamNet
takes those 150-plus messages a day and kicks out all
but about 15 spam messages for me. That's 15 plus the
non-spam email that I'm always happy to see. Those
15 or so get through because no one has voted that
they're spam yet, so I click on the "Block" button so
other SpamNet users won't even have to see the email
if it should be sent to them.
In a collaborative method of junk email removal all email
marked as spam is shunted to a special spam folder.
When a user has time he or she can glance through the
file just to make sure that something they want isn't in
there by mistake - that could happen with the
collaborative method because some people sign up for
newsletters and then mark them as spam. In reality, it
doesn't happen often but if a user doesn't think
something in their spam folder is spam they
can "Unblock" it so they'll get it in the future.
The only catch is that, so far, SpamNet only works
with Microsoft Outlook. An Outlook Express version is
reportedly coming soon.
The service costs $3.99 per account per month, but I
conservatively estimate that SpamNet saves me
dozens of hours a month by freeing me from the time-
consuming and onerous task of manually deleting offers
from pornographers, herbal Viagra merchants,
refinancing guru's and those pesky third-world dictators
who need my help to slip get millions of dollars out of
their war-torn country. It's the best $3.99 I've ever
spent.
MIT Technology Review of Anti-Spam
Get Spamnet NOW!